Personal Finance

What if Zero Interest Rates Define the End….

 Old guys like Buffett, Soros, Fuss, yeah – me too, have cut our teeth during perhaps a most advantageous period of time, the most attractive epoch, that an investor could experience. Since the early 1970s when the dollar was released from gold and credit began its incredible, liquefying, total return journey to the present day, an investor that took marginal risk, levered it wisely and was conveniently sheltered from periodic bouts of deleveraging or asset withdrawals could, and in some cases, was rewarded with the crown of “greatness.” Perhaps, however, it was the epoch that made the man as opposed to the man that made the epoch.

Authors Dimson, Marsh and Staunton would probably agree. In fact, the title of their book “Triumph of the Optimists” rather cagily describes an epochal 101 years of investment returns – one in which it paid to be an optimist and a risk taker as opposed to a more conservative Scrooge McDuck. Written in 2002, they perhaps correctly surmised however, that the next 101 years were unlikely to be as fortunate because of the unrealistic assumptions that many investors had priced into their markets. And all of this before QE and 0% interest rates! In any case, their point – and mine as well – is that different epochs produce different returns and fresh coronations as well.

April IO Illustration-1My point is this: PIMCO’s epoch, Berkshire Hathaway’s epoch, Peter Lynch’s epoch, all occurred or have occurred within an epoch of credit expansion – a period where those that reached for carry, that sold volatility, that tilted towards yield and more credit risk, or that were sheltered either structurally or reputationally from withdrawals and delevering (Buffett) that clipped competitors at just the wrong time – succeeded. Yet all of these epochs were perhaps just that – epochs. What if an epoch changes? What if perpetual credit expansion and its fertilization of asset prices and returns are substantially altered?

.….read more of A Man in the Mirror” HERE

Bob Hoye: Universally Pathetic

Screen shot 2013-04-23 at 9.13.55 AMJapan’s central bank has announced that it intends to double the money stock over the next two years. As widely reported this is to be done by buying bonds. The trading floor cynic thinks it would be a whole lot easier to just do a “two for one” split.

To be serious, this is another example of “Do Whatever It Takes” to get CPI inflation up to 2 percent. This will be done by boosting the money supply, but the “inflation” desired in the consumer price index has been going elsewhere. Mainly in driving financial assets to precarious levels.

No matter how fancy the theories or “new” policies get, the main purpose is to fund the experiment in unlimited government. In which case, the not-so-hidden agenda is “Doing Whatever it Takes” to get their hands on your money. Taking whatever they can get.

A Screaming Sign Of A Stock Market Top

HUSSMAN: The Cover Of The Latest Barron’s Is A Screaming Sign Of A Stock Market Top

wmc130422a.jpg

….read more HERE

Hot Yield

 

When Michael Campbell wondered where investors were getting a far greater “yield” than the miniscule 1-1.5% now gotten from  Bonds & Banks he knew he could talk to  Real Estate Expert Ozzie Jurock. You can get to this short 9 minute clip where Ozzie & Mike illustrate the opportunities at the 26:57 – the 2:34 mark on the audio below:

{mp3}mtapril13ozziedilema{/mp3}

This article below came out today after Mike and Ozzie spoke above last Saturday :

 Is the housing market rebound petering out? Plus: Where to find “Better Than Bonds” returns with less risk!

 

Last year was a good one for the housing market. Sales rebounded somewhat, the inventory of homes for sale declined, and home prices reversed course and climbed in many parts of the country.

As I’ve said before, some of that recovery was based on natural, “core” forces — with the passing of time since the implosion of the bubble, a gradual recovery in buyer confidence, and some improvement in the job market, it was only natural to see housing begin to turn.

As I’ve said before, some of that recovery was based on natural, “core” forces — with the passing of time since the implosion of the bubble, a gradual recovery in buyer confidence, and some improvement in the job market, it was only natural to see housing begin to turn.

But I also warned that the market has increasingly been turbocharged by artificial demand. That demand stems from the incredible search for yield among institutional and individual investors.

Driven to despair by the reckless policies of global central banks, which have sliced the yield on safer investments like high-quality government bonds, they’ve flooded into the housing market like marauding swarms of locusts. They’ve been snapping up houses to turn around and rent them out, often paying cash, to generate yield.

But because they’re under such tremendous pressure, they’re aggressively outbidding each other, as well as traditional buyers. They’re paying too much money for too little of a rental income stream. And I believe that has set the stage for another housing market pullback — not one as bad as we had last time around, but something of a low-grade “Echo Bust.”

It’s All about Where the Demand is Coming From

In a normal housing market, demand and pricing is driven by average buyers. Think of people just looking to put a roof over their heads, using traditional mortgages, reasonable down payments, and the like.

But much more demand these days is coming from firms like Colony Capital. Never heard of them? Well, Colony is an investment company based in Santa Monica, California. The company has raised more than $2 billion to buy scores of homes all around the country. Their portfolio totaled roughly 7,000 homes as of March, up from 5,400 at the end of last year, which itself was DOUBLE the level of a quarter earlier.

Screen shot 2013-04-19 at 8.30.43 AMNow 7,000 homes isn’t a lot in the grand scheme of things. But Colony is far from alone. Even bigger firms like Blackstone are active in the same business, amassing 20,000 homes at a pace of about $100 million in purchases per WEEK.

Moreover, a ton of “me too” competitors are doing the same thing. One example of the fallout: TheWall Street Journal noted in late March that more than 31 percent of the homes purchased in Southern California early this year were bought by “absentee” buyers, those who don’t actually live in the homes. That was far above the long-term average of 17 percent that prevailed between 2000 and 2010.

I don’t know about you. But my memory of the last investor-driven boom in house sales and prices is pretty fresh. From what I recall, that 2003-2005 speculative bacchanalia didn’t exactly end well. So I find it interesting that there are already a few tentative signs that the turbocharged market is losing altitude.

Just consider home builder sentiment. A key index that tracks buyer traffic, current sales, and expectations about future sales dropped to 42 in April from 44 in March. Not only did that miss expectations for a reading of 45, it was also the third monthly decline in a row. That’s not what you want to see during the heart of the spring home buying season.

Meanwhile, single-family housing starts slumped 4.8 percent between February and March. Single-family permits also slipped 0.5 percent on the month, indicating a cooling in future construction activity.

Perhaps the biggest concern of all are the dramatic, investor-driven, high single-digit and low double-digit price surges we’ve seen in speculative markets like Phoenix, Las Vegas, Miami, and so on.

Are WAGES rising that fast in those markets?

Is JOB GROWTH or economic growth accelerating that quickly in those markets?

Of course not!

The wider the gap gets between price gains caused by traditional demand drivers — and price gains fueled by artificial investor demand — the greater the risk of a nasty correction.

What to Dump if Real Estate Stalls …

Many investors and analysts on Wall Street are in love with housing stocks, mortgage stocks, and almost anything related to them. But have these people noticed that shares of leading homebuilders like D.R. Horton (DHI) and Lennar (LEN) have given up all the year’s gains? Or that they’re basically trading where they did last September?

Or how about the mortgage-levered banks like Bank of America (BAC)? If the housing and mortgage markets are so strong, then why the heck did BofA just miss first-quarter profit estimates, citing weak mortgage performance?

Its consumer real estate services loss widened to $1.31 billion from $1.14 billion a year earlier, with both mortgage servicing and mortgage production revenue falling. Mortgage banking revenue also sank 9 percent sequentially at industry behemoth Wells Fargo (WFC), while application volume fell.

My advice is that you take profits in housing-sensitive stocks if you’ve been riding them higher. If you haven’t — and are looking for someplace to target profits or hedge downside risk using short sales or put options — those may be the kinds of stocks to target.

… And Where to Put Your Money Instead!

At the same time, what can you buy instead? Especially in light of all the points I’ve been making lately: Namely, that many types of bonds are loaded down with risk … while some particular stocks look incredibly promising?

Well, I’ve spent several weeks identifying six bond-trumping investments. The result of my exhaustive research is a report I’m calling “Beating the Bond Bubble: 6 Bubble-Busting Investments for Income and Profit!” Set for release on Monday, May 6 — just over two short weeks from now — this comprehensive report is jam-packed with information, such as …

* How to build a virtually impenetrable wall of protection around your fixed income portfolio!

* Three powerful ways to profit by steering clear of the bond market implosion altogether!

* One “bond alternative” Wall Street is pushing aggressively — but that you don’t want to touch with a ten-foot pole!

* The 286 best and worst stocks to own as bonds tank — plus the one little-known corner of the bond market still worth considering!

The information in this report is incredibly timely. Many of the names it contains are already moving higher — with one just hitting a multi-YEAR high. But if I’m right, this is just the beginning of a massive new wave of gains … gains that could trounce the total return of many types of bonds!

Once this report is made public, it will sell for $149. But through a special arrangement with my publisher, you can pre-order the report now for just $99. That will ensure you can download it immediately on May 6, and put these recommendations to work for you!

Plus, this is no “one and done” report! I will follow it up with four updates — one per quarter — to keep you abreast of all the latest developments that impact your positions. That way, you’ll know when to take your profits, cut your losses, or hang on tight for more potential gains!

All you have to do to reserve your copy is click here. Or you can call my customer service team at 1-800-291-8545. They’ll take care of you in a jiffy!

Until next time,

Mike

P.S. I think “Beating the Bond Bubble: 6 Bubble-Busting Investments for Income and Profit!” is an incredible bargain at $149. After all, you don’t just get the report and the recommendations within. You also get four quarterly updates over the span of the next year! But if you act now, you can get my hot-off-the-presses report for just $99. So please considerclicking here or calling my staff at 1-800-291-8545 right away!

Mike Larson graduated from Boston University with a B.S. degree in Journalism and a B.A. degree in English in 1998, and went to work for Bankrate.com. There, he learned the mortgage and interest rates markets inside and out. Mike then joined Weiss Research in 2001. He is the editor of Safe Money,Safe Money’s Crisis Trader, and LEAPS Options Alert. He is often quoted by the New York Sun,Washington PostReutersDow Jones NewswiresOrlando SentinelPalm Beach Post and Sun-Sentinel, and he has appeared on CNN, Bloomberg Television and CNBC.

 

10 Things You Need To Know Before The Opening Bell

Screen shot 2013-04-09 at 6.13.29 AMGood morning. Here’s what you need to know.

In earnings news, Morgan Stanley reported Q1 profit ex-charges of $0.61 per shareon revenue of $8.5 billion. Analysts were looking for earnings of  $0.57 per share, on revenue of $8.35 billion. Meanwhile,Pepsico Q1 earnings fell 4.6%. It reported profit of $0.69 per share, on revenue of $12.58 billion.