Timing & trends

The End Of Bear Markets

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Lance Roberts - Real Investment Advice

on Wednesday, 28 February 2018 07:08

A great, clear analysis of previous bubbles, bear markets & crashes and the ultimate conclusion of the Fed's desire to prevent any of the two negatives in that troika from ever occuring again. Lance Roberts is a Chief Portfolio Strategistand Chief Editor of the “Real Investment Advice -  Robert Zurrer for Money Talks.  

End-Of-Bear-MarketsMy…my…how quickly we forget.

Yesterday, as the markets rocketed higher, my email lit up with questions surrounding the discussion from this last weekend’s newsletter.

“I have questioned over the last couple of weeks exactly how much volatility the Fed would allow before stepping into the fray to keep the markets stable.

We now know it is roughly a 10% decline.

Specifically were the comments about QE being ‘useful to have in the toolkit for those times when the short-term interest rate tool may not be available,’ adding that the Fed is ‘quite likely’ to require large-scale asset purchases again because real rates will remain low due to slow productivity and labor-force growth. They also added that ‘if LSAPs are indeed not effective, then the Fed may need to take other measures.’ (Zerohedge has the complete article.)

In other words, despite the rhetoric to the contrary, the Fed isn’t going away…….ever!”

The deluge of emails revolved around much of the same premise.

“If the the Fed isn’t going away, then why would there ever be another bear market?” 

It is certainly an interesting question, particularly as the Fed continues to trot out officials to make market supporting statements such as Fed Vice Chairman Quarles who stated on Monday:

“It might seem reasonable to assume that faster growth would lead to firmer inflation. However, I think a lot remains to be seen.” 

Or even Mario Draghi, Chairman of the ECB, who said:

“In the presence of an economic situation that is improving constantly, we need the right blend of measures. Uncertainties continue to prevail.”

So, despite economies that are supposedly improving, Central Banks continue into their tenth year of “emergency measures.” As Michael Lebowitz recently stated:

“Global central banks’ post-financial crisis monetary policies have collectively been more aggressive than anything witnessed in modern financial history. Over the last ten years, the six largest central banks have printed unprecedented amounts of money to purchase approximately $14 trillion of financial assets as shown below. Before the financial crisis of 2008, the only central bank printing money of any consequence was the Peoples Bank of China (PBoC).”

With that, I certainly understand the reasoning that if indeed “Central Banks” are now committed to monetary interventions going forward, the financial markets have been effectively “fire-proofed against bear markets.”

But such a belief is extremely dangerous.

It is also the same “belief” every major bubble was built upon throughout history and driven by the same underlying foundations.

Which created the bubble in “THE” asset class of choice at that time…

Which created the bubble…

Which always ended badly for investors.

Every. Single. Time.

Is “this time different?”

No, and it will end just the same as every previous liquidity driven bubble throughout history.

Of this, there is absolute certainty.

There are only TWO questions that must be answered:

  1. What will cause it, and;
  2. When will it happen?

What Will Cause The Next Crash

No one knows for certain what will cause the next financial crisis. However, in my opinion, the most likely culprit will be a credit-related event caused by the Fed’s misguided policy of hiking interest rates,and tightening monetary policy, when the financial system is more heavily levered than at any other point in human history.

The illusion of liquidity has a dangerous side effect. The process of the previous two debt-deleveraging cycles led to rather sharp market reversions as margin calls, and the subsequent unwinding of margin debt fueled a liquidation cycle in financial assets. The resultant loss of the “wealth effect” weighed on consumption pushing the economy into recession which then impacted corporate and household debt leading to defaults, write-offs, and bankruptcies.

With the push lower in interest rates, the assumed “riskiness” of piling on leverage was removed. However, while the cost of sustaining higher debt levels is lower, the consequences of excess leverage in the system remains the same.

You will notice in the chart above, that even relatively small deleveraging processes had significant negative impacts on the economy and the financial markets. With total system leverage spiking to levels never before witnessed in history, it is quite likely the next event that leads to a reversion in debt will be just as damaging to the financial and economic systems.

Since interest rates affect “payments,” increases in rates negatively impact consumption, housing, and investment which ultimately deters economic growth.

It will ultimately be the level of interest rates which triggers some “credit event” that starts the “next bear market”  

It has happened every time in history.

Importantly, as prices decline it will trigger margin calls which will induce more indiscriminate selling. The forced redemption cycle will force investors to dump positions to meet margin calls at a time when the lack of buyers will create a vacuum causing rapid price declines.

When Will It Happen

Honestly, no one knows for sure. However, history can give us some guide.

“In the past six decades, the average length of time from the first tightening to the end of the business cycle is 44 months; the median is 35 months; and the lag from the initial rate hike to the end of the bull equity market is 38 months for the average, 40 months for the media.” – David Rosenberg

Averages and medians are great for general analysis but obfuscate the variables of individual cycles. To be sure the last three business cycles (80’s, 90’s and 2000) were extremely long and supported by a massive shift in financial engineering and a credit leveraging cycle. The post-Depression recovery, and WWII, drove the long economic expansion in the 40’s, and the “space race” supported the 60’s.

Currently, employment, economic and wage growth remain weak with 1-in-4 Americans on Government subsidies and the majority living paycheck-to-paycheck. This is why Central Banks, globally, have continued aggressively monetizing debt in order to keep growth from stalling out. With the Fed now hiking rates, and reducing market liquidity, the risk of a policy mistake has risen markedly.

If David is correct, given the Fed began their current rate hiking campaign in December 2015, the next recession would occur 38-months later or February 2019. Such a span would make the current economic expansion the second longest in history based on the weakest economic growth rates.

The chart and table below compares real, inflation-adjusted, GDP to Federal Reserve interest rate levels. The vertical purple bars denote the quarter of the first rate hike to the beginning of the next rate decrease, or onset of a recession.

If you look at the underlying data, which dates back to 1943, and calculate both the average and median for the entire span, you find:

  • The average number of quarters from the first rate hike to the next recession is 11, or 33 months.
  • The average 5-year real economic growth rate was 3.08%
  • The median number of quarters from the first rate hike to the next recession is 10, or 30 months.
  • The median 5-year real economic growth rate was 3.10%

The importance of this reflects the point made previously, the Federal Reserve lifts interest rates to slow economic growth and quell inflationary pressures. Yet, economic growth and inflation are running well below historical norms and system-wide leverage has surged to new records as individuals and corporations have feasted on debt in a low-rate environment.

That is now changing as the Fed hikes interest rates. Notice in the chart above, that recessions occur when the Fed starts hiking interest rates and the Fed rate approaches the 10-year Treasury rate. In every instance, a recession or “crisis” occurred.

Crisis, Recession & Bear Markets

If historical averages hold, and since major bear markets in equities coincide with recessions, then the current bull market in equities has about one year left to run. While the markets, due to momentum, may ignore the effect of “monetary tightening” in the short-term, the longer-term has been a different story.

As shown in the table below, the bulk of losses in markets are tied to economic recessionsHowever, there are also other events such as the Crash of 1987, the Asian Contagion, Long-Term Capital Management, and others that led to sharp corrections in the market as well.

The point is that in the short-term the economy, and the markets (due to momentum), can SEEM TO DEFY the laws of gravity as interest rates begin to rise. However, as rates continue to rise they ultimately act as a “brake” on economic activity.

While rising interest rates may not “initially” impact asset prices, it is a far different story to suggest that they won’t. In fact, there have been absolutely ZERO times in history that the Federal Reserve has begun an interest rate hiking campaign that has not eventually led to a negative outcome.

What the majority of analysts fail to address is the “full-cycle” effect from rate hikes. While equities may initially provide a haven from rising interest rates during the first half of the rate cycle, they have been a destructive place to be during the second-half.

It is clear from the analysis that “bad things” have tended to follow the Federal Reserve’s first interest rate increase. While the markets, and economy, may seem to perform okay during the initial phase of the rate hiking campaign, the eventual negative impact will push most individuals to “panic sell” near the next lows. Emotional mistakes are 50% of the cause as to why investors consistently underperform the markets over a 20-year cycle.

The exact “what” and “when” of the next “bear market” is unknown. It has always been some unanticipated event that triggers the “reversion to the mean.”

It will be obvious in “hindsight.”

While the media will loudly protest that “no one could have seen it coming,” there are plenty of clues if you only choose to look.

The Fed has not put an “end” to bear markets. 

In fact, they have likely only succeeded in ensuring the next bear market will be larger than the last.

For now, the bullish trend is still in place and should be “consciously” honored. However, while it may seem that nothing can stop the markets rise, or seemingly the Fed will never let it fall, it is crucial to remember that it is “only like this, until it is like that.”

For those “asleep at the wheel,” there will be a heavy price to pay when the taillights turn red.

Lance Roberts


Lance Roberts is a Chief Portfolio Strategist/Economist for Clarity Financial. He is also the host of “The Lance Roberts Show” and Chief Editor of the “Real Investment Advice” website and author of “Real Investment Daily” blog and “Real Investment Report“. Follow Lance on FacebookTwitter and Linked-In


Timing & trends

Victor Adair: US Dollar Catches a Bid - Stocks on "A Dead Cat Bounce"

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Victor Adair - Live From The Trading Deskng Desk

on Tuesday, 27 February 2018 07:15

Victor Adair forecasts the near term direction of Stocks, Treasuries, Gold and Currencies including the vital US Dollar. Wrapping up the action of the markets last and telling Michael exactly what posititions he has on now - Robert Zurrer for Money Talks 

The DJIA topped out one month ago after a 45%+ rally since Trump’s election. The DJIA moved broadly sideways between 16,000 and 18,000 for most of 2014, 2015 and 2016 and then took off on a 14 month Run for the Roses parabolic burst to 26,618. Following that top the DJIA had a swift 11% correction (top to bottom) and an equally swift bounce back from the lows with the market now slightly above where it was at the beginning of the year.


Larger Chart

I think the bounce back from the lows is a dead cat bounce and that we’ll see new lows for two reasons, 1) The 9 year bull market is long in the tooth and the recent parabolic price action looks to have defined a top and 2) the global accommodative



Timing & trends

The Most Popular 3 Articles This Week

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Money Talks Editor

on Saturday, 24 February 2018 07:56

hauling arrow up graph anim 300 clr 13071

1. Rising Interest Rates & The Coming

   Banking Crisis

    by Martin Armstrong

Armstrong, who has been very accurate on rising interest rates, and he impact they are having on pensions and Europe says he sees another banking crisis coming just as the United States is looking at a new radical bank rescue policy. A policy that will effect depositors rather than taxpayers

....continue HERE

2. Your Moral & Intellectual Superiors

   by Michael Campbell

According to the Finance Minister the budget is going to be fair. Of course it will be, as long as eveyone shares Trudeau and Morneau's opinion. Mike on one of the most divisive characteristics of our society

....read it all HERE

3.  Jack Crooks: The Next Big 8 Year Bull Market

The 3 charts below tell the story: Jack Crooks makes a powerful argument that the US Dollar has entered into a long-term bear market cycle which will trigger a massive BIG move in sold out commodities for the next 8 years

...read more HERE


Timing & trends

A Permanent Plateau: Crypto Bubbles

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Thomas Macpherson

on Friday, 23 February 2018 10:46

As this analyst say's "Most of the time, getting off the mountain is far more dangerous than the ascent". For those who remember the tech crashes of 2000-2002 or the slump in 2007-2009, this article lays out the danger inherent in the latest bubble in crypto currencies. A quick look at the sophistication of the players immediately is chilling! - Robert Zurrer for Money Talks

iStock bitcoin 2014 03 24You think your facts are more valuable than my feelings. I’m tired of being told facts. Sometimes facts just don’t matter. Sometimes facts are not facts." 

-- Bobbie Sanders, Inaugural Attendee

One attendee said, “I think stock picking abilities are overrated. I’ve beaten the stock market for something like 6 years in a row. People in index funds are driving a VW while I’m in a Porsche” When asked how his returns fared versus the S&P, the investor said he really didn’t track numbers like that. 

-- Shaun Rodriguez

The view from the top of bull markets is remarkably like that from the top of the Matterhorn. What begins in a slow ascent at the base becomes a near vertical cliff for the last quarter. Sitting at the apex one might be inclined to puff up a little bit about their climbing abilities. One thing climbers will tell you on a regular basis is that disaster usually happens when you lose that sense of risk. Studies show that 60-70% of accidents happen to climbers on the way down not on the way up. It’s often referred to as “hikers’ letdown”[1]. While the view from the top is great, the danger lies in getting cocky at the height of the climb.

Market Bubbles

I bring all this up because many investors are sitting smugly on top of their own investment Matterhorn – serenely looking down at those numbers that seem so small down below. If we follow our hiker’s advice, now is the time to utilize the most caution and avoid the 1000-foot fall into a market crevasse. Put another way, Ieyasu Tokugawa always said that after a victory one must tighten the helmet strap.

The funny things about market bubbles is you can’t put your finger on exactly when they start or even if you are in one at the time. Knowing you have been in one is a heckuva of a lot clearer. But I would proffer that in the later stages of a bubble there are some events that take place that really aren’t seen in less exuberant times. For instance:


  • At the height of the Japanese asset bubble in 1989, the value of the land underneath the Imperial Palace in Tokyo (roughly 280 acres) was worth the same as the entire acreage of California (roughly 100,000,000 acres).
  • Near the height of the technology bubble in 1999, there were 457 IPOs of which nearly 80% were technology companies. Of those, 117 doubled in price on their first day of trading.
  • In 1999, thirty of the top 50 stocks (by market size) on the Nasdaq exchange had prices that reflected estimated growth to be 35% for the next 50 years.


Cryptocurrencies: The Symptom or the Disease?



Timing & trends

The '87 Crash & Why the most-recent selloff was just the beginning

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Simon Black - Sovereign Man

on Thursday, 22 February 2018 11:58


With more than $300 billion managed by trend-following hedge funds who can sell in an instant & furiously with computerized systems, the potential for a crash as bad or worse than 1987 exists now. Simon Black clearly explains the danger - Robert Zurrer for Money Talks 


On October 19, 1987, the Dow experienced its biggest one-day percentage loss in history – plunging 22.6%. 

It was “Black Monday.” The selloff was so fast and so severe, nothing else even comes close. 

The second worst percentage loss for the Dow was October 28, 1929 (also Black Monday) when the exchange fell 12.82%. It fell another 11.73% the next day (you guessed it… “Black Tuesday”). Then the Great Depression hit. 



<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >> Page 9 of 453

Free Subscription Service - sign up today!

Exclusive content sent directly to your Inbox

  • What Mike's Reading

    His top research pick

  • Numbers You Should Know

    Weekly astonishing statistics

  • Quote of the Week

    Wisdom from the World

  • Top 5 Articles

    Most Popular postings

Learn more...

Our Premium Service:
The Inside Edge on Making Money

Latest Update

Photon Control Up-Lists to TSX

Posts record Backlog & Stock Hits New Highs This month we update Photon Control Inc. (TSX-V: PHO) which was recommended this time last...

- posted by Ryan Irvine

Michael Campbell Robert Zurrer
Tyler Bollhorn Eric Coffin Jack Crooks Patrick Ceresna
Josef Mark Leibovit Greg Weldon Ryan Irvine