Login

Personal Finance

Secrets for Making and Protecting Gains With Interest Rates & Dividends at 220 Year Lows

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Danielle Park - Venable Park Investment

on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 18:16

Danielle addresses the challenge posed by generational low interest rates and dividend yields, especially to retirees. The chart shows that in the past 220 years interest rates have been lower than the current 2.87% only once, in 1946.

TGR: In your book, Juggling Dynamite: An insider's wisdom about money management, markets, and wealth that lasts, you advise against a buy-and-hold strategy. How can individual investors pick the right time to buy and sell stocks in a volatile market?

Danielle Park: When I talk about avoiding buy-and-hold, I mean being aware of this secular bear phase. We are in year 12 of a 15 to 20 year cycle. During secular bears you get recessions every three or four years, during which stocks tend to lose about 45% of their value. It is not a good reward for the risk to hold a stock on such a wild rollercoaster; even if it is paying you some dividends, the emotional and financial costs to your capital are just too extreme.

Today, I tell people: first of all, pay off your debt. Second, downsize your non-productive assets like personal use real estate. Third, figure out how to increase your income through your ingenuity and effort. Once you have a pile of savings you have a couple of choices. 

You could decide to stay out of equity markets completely and put your money in short-term deposits. Even though they pay very little, they keep your capital intact to fight another day. This is a very reasonable approach and, frankly, is the one most people should take. 

Another approach is to pare off a portion of your capital and trade with that. You might take 20% of your assets out of guaranteed deposits and hire a money manager or see if you can trade day-to-day swings. This is extremely hard to do with success, but if you can define the portion of your life savings you are willing to risk and maintain that discipline, it may be a reasonable idea to try with a controlled portion of your money. 

The disastrous approach in my view, which many people are doing today is to give 50%, 60% or 70% of their life savings to brokers and financial planners to plop it into equities without paying any attention to the secular climate or to whether we are approaching the next recession or to where market prices are. They plop it in with reckless disregard, and within short order a huge chunk of capital could vaporize. 

If that is the approach offered, then I say you are better off avoiding stocks altogether and sticking with interest-bearing, short-term deposits. Keep your capital safe and wait until conditions improve in the next few years. 

TGR: Danielle, you recently wrote in EQ Trend Watch about the challenge posed by generational low interest rates and dividend yields, especially to retirees, illustrated with a chart showing that in the past 220 years interest rates have been lower than the current 2.87% only once, in 1946. When might that shift?

DP: That interest chart shows definite secular swings. Rates trend higher for 25 to 30 years and then lower for about the same time period. We are about zero-bound now, so we ought to be heading into a rising rate environment again.

Park graph

TGR: Will global problems like the European debt crisis prolong low interest rates or cause inflation to rear back?

DP: We have a pretty complex little puzzle right now. I believe a global recession is coming in the next 12 months or is already underway. The U.S. was the only country in the developed world with any positive momentum in Q411. Even that was the result of trillions of dollars of deficit spending and debt. Going into 2012, the headwinds are mounting.

Most European countries are in recession. The austerity measures the International Money Fund and the EU are insisting on for Greece, Portugal and Ireland are a self-fulfilling prophecy of deep recession. China recently cut its reserve ratios for its banking system out of concern about a drop-off in shipments and demand from its best customers. 

The other side of the coin is what happens when countries become so indebted that their bond yields suddenly begin to spike because of credit concerns. That is when central banks ultimately lose control of the bond market. We have the likelihood of policy rates remaining extremely low—Ben Bernanke says until 2014. The U.S. recently added another $1.6 trillion to its debt; the amount of money owed is mind boggling. For 20 years, Japan pushed rates to zero and tried to control interest expense because its economy was so indebted. However, despite or really because of its efforts the economic malaise continued and Japan is back in recession today.

Worse, today we have a world of Japans; there is nowhere to look for better yields. When all countries are going through a similar dynamic with credit agencies downgrading in concert, you have to wonder how the bond market will force rates higher when there are relatively few options to go to. Recently, global money has shown a strong appetite for the U.S. dollar and the U.S. bond market as a safe haven. But, at some point—and probably sooner than many people think—even that will become a credit risk.

TGR: Will anemic interest rates, fear of debt and inflation and currency problems continue to support rising commodity prices, particularly gold?

DP: Yes and no. Oil has been trading above $105 per barrel on fears about Iran. When oil appreciates dramatically, that puts a huge tax on an already weak consumption base; we have seen that in lower U.S. gasoline consumption for example. So yes, the geopolitical scenario may continue to feed a fear premium on sectors like energy. 

However, in the liquidity crunches of 2001–02 and again in 2008–09, we saw levered players in equities and the commodity space sell across the board because cash became the desperate elixir that everybody wanted to meet margin and redemption calls. The selling becomes a self-fulfilling circle. When that happens, it hits everything, including gold. As a result, I think the price of commodities could fall off again and much harder than many people today are thinking possible. 

TGR: You paint a pretty dark picture. Based on historic bear periods, how much downside do we have to go before we get into another bull cycle?

DP: We have had six secular bear phases in the last couple of centuries, each lasting 15 to 20 years, followed by a secular bull phase of similar duration. The secular bear market starts with massive overvaluation, anemic dividend yields, over-levered consumers and weak savings rates. We have to work our way through that. Debt gets paid down or written off. Consumers build up their savings. They learn to live on less. They become more resilient. At the end of the period, they are in better shape than at the beginning. This sets up the next secular boom phase. 

From all the sign posts on this process, we are not through the bear phase yet. The price/earnings ratio on equities in general is still well above 20. That is not the valuation levels from which secular bulls are born. Dividend yields are below 3%. At the start of a secular bull phase, they are more likely to be double that. Saving rates need to be above 10%. They are now around 4% in the U.S. and Canada. We will not get into a period of greater economic strength until debt levels fall and savings are built back up. 

I think the most important thing individuals can do is be self-protective, realistic and patient, because all of this comes full circle. We are now working our way through the healing process. We have probably another five years or so to get debt levels paid down and savings levels built up. 

People do not have to be decimated by this. They need to realize this is not a time to embrace a lot of risk. It is not the time to retire on a couple hundred thousand bucks or even a couple million bucks. Be pragmatic and protect what you have. Keep working to augment your income. If you have too much non-income producing real estate or are over-levered, figure out how to pay it down. If you do this, you will have liquid assets, capital, savings and the ability to buy things when the opportunities arrive. 

TGR: When the market comes back will certain sectors or subsectors improve faster than others? 

DP: As an asset class, I call equities jelly beans. Do I like red jelly beans more than purple jelly beans or more than yellow jelly beans? They are all similar. My preference would be to earn income, first of all. You would like to have dividend-paying instruments and small caps tend to produce very little income. But price is also very important. If you buy something today for a 3% dividend and it drops 20% to 30% in value, it will not feel like you got a good deal or made a prudent move. What you want to do is let the price risk come out of the asset. Lower prices mean lower risk to capital. When dividend yields are twice what they are now, you can allocate some capital to jelly beans of all the colors you want. But, basically all of the jelly beans move together. When capital flow leaves the market, it leaves everything. When capital flow returns, it goes back into everything. 

Central bankers are trying to stop asset values from declining. The status quo keeps trying to pump prices up and keep them at unattractive valuations. There is a push-and-pull going on. Eventually gravity wins. Central banks will not prevail, asset prices will continue to move lower and that will be a very healthy thing.

TGR: Can investors take some of the risk out by being active investors and being smart about what they invest in?

DP: Sure. There are lots of ways to be smart. I am a trained financial analyst and in the '90s I spent a lot of time studying management, pouring over balance sheets and income statements. I came to the conclusion that it was a complete and utter waste of time.

I may decide a company is excellent and the management is wonderful. I think it is worth $20/share, but it is trading at $40/share. You have to decide: Will you buy it anyway or will you be disciplined about the price you are willing to pay? Very few people have the discipline to stick to a set of rules. 

We follow a regimented set of rules that takes into account many factors, that looks for opportunities. We have successfully executed that discipline over many years, but it is not easy. Ours is not a day trading system, but a longer trend approach that selects sectors and indices rather than individual companies. 

I describe it as a person holding a piece of paper right up to the end of her nose, trying to read what is on the paper. If she held the paper at arm's length, it is much easier to read and understand the bigger picture. The minutiae rarely help you navigate the broader picture of capital market cycles. 

Investing in a local business owner is different. You can see what he is doing. His company is not traded in the public auction of stock markets. If you want to invest in the triplex up the street, you can fix it up, monitor it and rent it. Individuals can be well-equipped to make those kinds of assessments. Publicly traded assets are a whole other kettle of fish.

TGR: If someone has a good, trained money manager, is it worth it to take advantage of some of these opportunities?

DP: Well, of course. I happen to be a money manager, so I hope people think it is still worthwhile to hire some of us. People need to ask themselves two questions. The first is how much capital should I apportion to that approach? The second is what were my money manager's returns in 2001 and 2008 when the markets lost half its value? 

Too many people ask, what was your return last year? What will you get for me? In a rising market, everything gets capital flow. You do not need much skill to allocate capital in a rising market. It does take skill to protect capital in a falling market. If a manager lost in step with down markets, it tells you his strategy is not worth the fee. That manager is simply riding flows up and letting your capital fall along with everything else. In a secular bear environment you will be one of the masses, devastated and trying to liquidate at the last moment. You will not have the psychological strength you need to maintain liquidity and to know what you want to buy when prices sell off. Only a handful of money managers exercise the discipline to protect your capital in this kind of environment and can participate in the upside where it presents. 

TGR: Will you share your strategies for the down years?

DP: Sure. We actually have achieved positive returns throughout, but it has not been easy. Our investors have had to be content with years where they made 1% or 2% in order to be prepared for downturns in years like 2008, when we made more than 8%. 

Mainstream economists, commentators and politicians never see recessions coming even though they are regular features of a secular bear market. They occur every three or four years and they are catastrophic for capital. Rather than focusing on being there for all the gyrations to the upside, it is far more important to be as protected as possible from the downside. 

The only way to survive is to have your own set of rules that work for you, or to have an independent manager who does not work for the sell side. You want an absolute return manager who says, I don't want to lose money in any particular year, so our benchmark is to always advance the capital, even if the advance is small in a given year. The whole focus is on not losing, because once you lose, it sets you back years. 

TGR: What was the role of gold and gold equities in your strategy during the down years? 

DP: I think it is a mistake to think of gold as a separate asset class that is impervious to the panic swings in the market. When things sell off in concert, these assets sell off, too. Gold has been in a secular bull run for a long while, and it may go higher. But secular bulls always come to an end. When you are 12 years into a secular run, you have to at least be thinking about the possibility of it coming to a peak like we did in 1980.

My second caveat is this nonsensical idea that gold is the only thing that cannot be manipulated. Anyone who has studied the history of gold could not make that comment with a straight face. Humans have always found ways to lie about how much gold is in reserve whether it be in bank vaults, Fort Knox or in the ground at a particular mine. The incidents of fraud and manipulation around gold are legendary. If you don't realize that, you are in grave danger.

TGR: Your talk at the World MoneyShow in Vancouver on March 28 is called "The Best Way to Make and Protect Gains That Most Financial Advisors Will Never Tell You." Can you give our readers a sneak preview?

DP: I start out with some big picture stuff. For example, the best way to make money in the stock market is not to be a buyer in the stock market but to be a seller to the stock market. Take an enterprise you built and sell it in an initial public offering (IPO) that creates billions of dollars for the original investors. But, the investment public should be extremely cautious and skeptical about IPOs because those instruments are always brought in at the peak of a valuation. After it is marketed to the investment public, it is common for those shares to lose 30%, 40%, 50% in short order. 

Another example is the importance of knowing your sell point before you buy anything. Very few people do this. They see the stock market as an endless mountain. They think, if I start climbing today, 5, 10 or 15 years from now I will be higher than I am today. Not in a secular bear market. The secular bear market is range bound. You will climb up, then come back and retest, four or five times before that period ends. 

I am not dispensing conventional wisdom. Yet, in the 20 or so years I have been managing risk for myself and others, these are the things I have learned that are most important to long-term success. I try to pull back that piece of paper stuck to the end of everyone's nose and say, hey look, this is the big picture. 

TGR: Any last thoughts for our readers?

DP: Good luck and I wish them well. And remember, it is not dark to be a realist and be a pragmatist. I believe it is the best way to survive and thrive through all market conditions.. 

TGR: Thank you so much for your time and your insights. 

Portfolio manager, attorney, finance author and a regular guest on North American media, Danielle Parkis the author of the best selling myth-busting book Juggling Dynamite: An insider's wisdom on money management, markets and wealth that lasts, as well as a popular daily financial blog Juggling Dynamite.Park worked as an attorney until 1997 when she was recruited to work for an international securities firm. Becoming a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA), she now helps to manage millions for some of North America's wealthiest families as a portfolio manager and analyst at the independent investment counsel firm she co-founded, Venable Park Investment Counsel Inc. In recent years Park has been writing, speaking and educating industry professionals as well as investors on the risks and realities of investment behaviors. She is a member of the internationally recognized CFA Institute, Toronto Society of Financial Analysts and the Law Society of Upper Canada. 

Want to read more exclusive Gold Report interviews like this? Sign up for our free e-newsletter, and you'll learn when new articles have been published. To see a list of recent interviews with industry analysts and commentators, visit our Exclusive Interviews page.

DISCLOSURE: 



Banner

Personal Finance

Retire WITH a mortgage and other unconventional ideas

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Dustan Woodhouse, AMP

on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 16:02

Dustan Woodhouse was one of the six Personal Finance workshop presenters at this year's World Outlook Financial Conference. As the world markets reel from one debt disaster story to another Dustan discussed the practical realities, pitfalls and opportunities of personal debt in the days ahead.

To see Dustan's complete PowerPoint presentation - CLICK HERE

For more information contact him at www.ourmortgageexpert.com .



Banner

Personal Finance

21 ways to make your home sell faster

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Ozzie Jurock

on Monday, 13 February 2012 08:23

images

When selling a home (or anything else for that matter), the marketing effort must be coordinated on all fronts. It also must be superior to the competition. This is especially true in a buyers' market where the homes sitting on the market seemingly outnumber the potential home buyers. In such an environment, you must lift your home out from this crowd and highlight it in the best way possible. You must out-think the competition.

So, the market is off by 50 per cent. So what. It's still four times larger than it was in 1982. The key is to get your property placed into the 50 per cent which sells now.

All good marketing efforts begin life as a sound, basic plan and then evolves to fit the particular property and situation. Cut from whole cloth and then tailor-made, such a plan will incorporate innovative new ideas and "rearrange" old ones.

Here then, are a few of these ideas:

 

1. Select a Quality Realtor: Based on my travels around the world and as president of both Royal LePage and NRS National real estate companies, I believe British Columbia and Alberta are home to some of the most qualified, professional realtors in North America today. But there are also some who are little more than "order takers" who literally can't properly write out a contract, much less have the hard-won knowledge needed to position your home in the most appropriate and effective way for your particular market. So how do you find such an experienced, market aggressive realtor?

Ask around. Check with friends or trusted associates and get some names. Experienced names. When selling in today's market, you need to be in the hands of a practicing "doctor" and not someone eager to practice on you.

Focus in the three best referrals, ask each of these realtors to come out, have them put together a marketing evaluation and then give you his/her specific action plan as to what he/she will do to sell your home. Make sure it's in writing. (If the realtor is "too busy" to physically come and view your home...well, you've just eliminated one name from your list.) Remember: realtors come in a couple of basic flavors. While there are always exceptions, in general a "low-key" yet thorough realtor is best when it comes to helping you buy a home; his or her pragmatic knowledge will help keep your feet firmly on the ground. When selling a home however, look for a high-energy, dynamic realtor whose enthusiasm might be "infectious" enough to enthuse a potential buyer.

The market evaluation should compare your home with at least three currently active competitive listings, three recent competitive sales and three competitive and now inactive listings which didn't sell. Drive over and check out these benchmark properties yourself to ensure the realtor has put your home in the right "ballpark". If you disagree, find out the reasoning as to why the realtor has so placed your home. The reasons could be good ones indeed. (Or vice versa.)

Once you've vetted all three choices, go with the realtor whose combination of experience, proven performance and action-plan for your home is the most impressive. But be careful not to confuse impressive with unattainable.

Ensure your home is listed on the Multiple Listing Service. The more exposure, the better.

List your home with the chosen realtor for 60 days. If the realtor suggests you list with him or her for a longer period, tell him or her you will renew if, in your opinion, all the realtor's written promises have meanwhile been adhered to and met all the previously agreed upon elements of the action plan. If not, tough luck. Find another realtor.

Underline to the realtor that you wish to be kept informed of the sales progress at least once a week during the entire listing period. Every time the home is shown to prospective buyers, ensure the realtor informs you in advance and also gives you a feedback as to the viewer's reaction to the home. On the other hand, don't overdo it. Be courteous and be careful not to nag the realtor. When dealing with a professional, be professional.

If the realtor has failed to keep his or her promises during the listing period, cancel the listing.

 

....read the other 20 ways HERE



Banner

Personal Finance

Foreclosures and distressed sales INCREASE house values

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Mark Hanson

on Monday, 13 February 2012 07:19

images

The entire world is now brainwashed to think foreclosures are a bad thing for the housing market. Perhaps four years ago when a million loans all went into default & Foreclosure at the same time but not today. They want you to believe Foreclosures are a bad thing so they can continue to kick the can, which benefits politicians and banks.

 

Most misunderstood facts on foreclosures… HERE



Banner

Personal Finance

Canada’s Housing Bubble Is Stretched to the Limit

Share on Facebook Tweet on Twitter

Posted by Robert Morely - TheTrumpet.com

on Thursday, 09 February 2012 00:00

Houses-NewZealand

 

Vancouver the second least affordable city in the World. But perhaps the biggest sign of a Canadian housing bubble is debt. The average debt burden of Canadian families stands at a remarkable 153 percent of disposable income—and growing. If the bubble bursts millions of Canadians will be left paying a fixed mortgage on a rapidly depreciating asset that will destroy their financial lives.

 

Canada’s Housing Bubble Is Stretched to the Limit


Do the math: If you earned a salary of $50,000 per year, and bought an average house, it would cost almost $300,000 (in Regina a 900sq ft house built on a small lot in the 1930's goes for more than $200,000). In Canada, this salary puts you in the 20 percent tax bracket. That means you really only bring home $40,000 per year, or $3,300 per month.

 

Now look at your mortgage costs. A 4.5 percent, fixed-rate, 30-year mortgage has a monthly payment of $1,520 per month. Almost half your total income goes to paying just the mortgage. That’s why the mortgage industry started providing zero-down 40-year loans, before the federal government banned them for being too risky for consumers.

 

If you are like many people, and don’t have a 20 percent down payment, you will need to buy mortgage insurance. Estimate another $250 per month if you have close to 20 percent. If you only put down 5 percent, you will need to cough up closer to $700 per month.

 

Then there are property taxes: Add at least another $500 per month. Property insurance: Another 250 per month.

 

You haven’t even begun to consider upkeep costs, or home owner’s association fees, and you are already paying $2,520 per month. If you only put 5 percent down, you would be paying $2,970 per month. That would leave you a miniscule $330 per month, all of which would probably be needed to pay utilities.

 

....read it all HERE



Banner

<< Start < Prev 161 162 163 164 Next > End >> Page 163 of 164

Free Subscription Service - sign up today!

Exclusive content sent directly to your Inbox

  • What Mike's Reading

    His top research pick

  • Numbers You Should Know

    Weekly astonishing statistics

  • Quote of the Week

    Wisdom from the World

  • Top 5 Articles

    Most Popular postings

Learn more...



Michael Campbell Robert Zurrer
Tyler Bollhorn Eric Coffin Jack Crooks Patrick Ceresna
Ozzie Jurock Mark Leibovit Greg Weldon Ryan Irvine